Sunday, October 17, 2010
Michael Franti and Spearhead in Madison
What a Great Autumn Day
Butternut Squash Soup with Pear, Cider, and Vanilla Bean
3 T olive oil
4 generous cups butternut squash
2 firm, ripe pears
1 medium yellow onion, coarsely chopped
1 c apple cider
4 c vegetable or chicken broth
1/2 t salt
1/2 c half and half or cream
1 vanilla bean
finely chopped chives
Heat oil in a dutch oven or small stockpot over medium heat. Add squash, pears, onion and stir to coat with oil. Cook for 10 to 15 minutes, stirring occasionally until onion is soft and transparent and pears are starting to fall apart.
Add the cider and bring mixture to boil over medium- high heat. Add broth, reduce heat to medium-low and simmer the mixture, partially covered, for about 30 minutes until squash is tender.
Using a blender or food processor and working in small batches, don't fill your blender jar more than one-third full; hot liquids expand - puree until very smooth. Return the soup to the stockpot and add the salt. Continue to cook, uncovered, over medium-low heat until the soup has reduced to about one-half to one-third of its original volume. stir occasionally. the final consistency is up to you; when it reaches a thickness that seems right, not too thin, not too thick, it's ready.
While the soup is reducing, put the half-and-half in a small saucepan. Using a sharp knife, scrape the tiny black seeds out of the pod. Scoop the seeds and the pod into the saucepan with the half-and-half, and warm it over low heat, swirling occasionally, until it steams. Do not allow it to boil. Pull it from the heat, remove and discard the pod, and whisk to break up any clumps of seeds. Set aside. When the soup has reduced to your desired thickness, stir in the infused half-and-half. Taste, and adjust the seasoning as necessary.
Serve, garnished with a sprinkling of fresh chives.
4 - 5 servings
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Monday, September 27, 2010
Friday, September 10, 2010
Thursday, September 9, 2010
On a related note. . .
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
On the whole mosque thing - please read to the end
But, I find it offensive that a particular religious persuasion wants to put a “learning center” near the grounds of one of the worst terrorist attacks that has happened to our great country since Pearl Harbor. Many innocent people died during that horrific attack, and now this “religious” organization feels it has the right to put a cultural center on hallowed ground, a mere 3 blocks from the attack. This is not acceptable.
Remember that even Joseph Stalin, the great tyrant and murderer of millions of people, agreed with the notions of free speech and freedom of religion (provided you agreed with him, and didn’t publically contradict him). And there’s an important lesson to be learned here: freedom of speech and religion are correct, and even necessary, so long as the will of the majority and those in power are respected. That’s why this issue is so significant. This “cultural center,” though approved through a local planning process, threatens to deprive millions of us of our God given (and constitutionally affirmed) rights to discriminate against those that we (however inaccurately) feel have bereaved us.
I’ve read and heard things like “it would be like drawing swastikas on a Jewish temple”, or, like “putting up a monument to Hirohito at Pearl Harbor”. That’s exactly what this is like. I’ll add another: erecting this religious building would be like letting Germans into the Holocaust museum. Need I say more?
I find this idea offensive and anti-American. I urge all Americans to fight against this attack on our civil liberties, and to show some tolerance to those who might be offended by this un-American, and, indeed, Ungodly act. The Bill of Rights does not include people that disagree with us! I think the founding fathers would agree. As Newt Gingrich so eloquently asked: “has Saudi Arabia allowed churches to be built in their country?" They have not. Clearly, we should take our cues from Saudi Arabia when it comes to religious freedom. Until Saudi Arabia allows a church to be built in “Arabia,” we shouldn’t allow one here, in Oklahoma City. I think that much is crystal clear.
So, to all Americans reading this, please join me in rejecting the plan for an Irish Catholic church to be built near downtown Oklahoma City, where a terrorist attack took the lives of 168 people, including 19 children, in 1995. The first amendment, which includes religious freedom, is in this country paramount. But not in this case. The Irish Catholics may have a “right” to build their church here, but it isn’t a wise decision. It is a decision better left to an angry, hostile mob, than one left to our constitution and bill of rights (and general sense of fairness).
The Irish Catholic church, despite its rich history of charity and good works, should be judged as a whole by Mr. Timothy McVeigh, an Irish Catholic who bombed the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, killing many Americans. Some will say “should we take the actions of one or even a few people as representative of a large and ultimately peaceful religion?” Yes we should. Because if we don’t, religious freedom will run rampant in our beautiful country, and we will have to resort to stopping women from driving, preventing little girls from going to school, and we’ll have to cut the hands off of people that steal. Like Saudi Arabia. Friends: they got it right.
Speaking of Saudi Arabia, and at the risk of sounding controversial, it’s possible we should consider banning Christianity in all of the United States of America. Tim McVeigh was a Christian, and as such must have spoken for the majority of Christians. Is this a hateful, prejudiced religion? Consider this: the KKK based their actions and beliefs on Christian teachings, and we all know where that lead. A handful of whackos used their religion as an excuse to torment and harass, and even to kill and maim innocent human beings. Never again.
Never mind that the overwhelming majority of people of this faith are decent, hardworking, loving people. Never mind that they are our neighbors, coworkers, and friends. It’s only logical that we should decry, condemn, and censure their entire religion on the basis of one or a few of the religion’s followers. It just makes sense.

